What to do about Trump's attempts to dismantle U.S. higher education has been a topic of discussion over the length of his first administration and is now becoming more urgent in the 2nd round. The podcast discussion of the AAC&U "The Trust Agenda" describes the reasons behind and the report provides a framework for how higher education can work together to combat the often unsupported and antagonistic assertions made by Trump.
After directly attacking key institutions, it is predictable that Trump would move on to attack accreditation because it is one of the core foundations for credibility of institutions in the U.S. and many colleges and universities beyond its boundaries. The new Education Department accreditation proposal takes authority away from existing groups under the guise of their having neglected their "position of public trust." Policy experts and accreditation officials "fear that the proposal will permanently politicize the long-standing evaluation mechanism designed to create uniform standards for American colleges and universities."
The Department of Defense (DOD) demanded records of 30 U.S. universities with international partnerships. The notice required an "'immediate and comprehensive' audit of their partnerships with foreign institutions that it says could be a threat to national security" by the end of the month (August, 2026). The claim is not new and is part of the relay race of attacking higher education under the direction of the Trump administration.
Elite colleges and universities were the first target - largely because their visibility makes them vulnerable and, secondarily, once the top falls, the rest are easy to take down. Whether it's the AAC&U solidarity stance or other strategies to come, higher education and those who value it must come together in vocal opposition to what's happening.
Further updates to follow - watch for changes on my blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.